Skip to main content

We live in the age of answers.
It's time to reclaim the questions.

The ones getting ahead aren't just using better tools. They're thinking differently, and building systems that work for them specifically. Managing Disruptions trains both.

The Problem

Everyone has access to the same AI. The same models, the same speed, the same output that looks finished.

What nobody is saying: every time you accept a first-pass response without questioning it, you're training yourself to stop thinking. That doesn't scale. It atrophies.

The risk isn't that AI replaces you. It's that you replace yourself. Slowly, comfortably, one delegation at a time.

There's a second problem nobody talks about. The tools are only as powerful as the system you've built around them. Most people have no system. They have habits.

Three moments in any thinking process where friction disappears — and most people let it.

Blank Page

The capacity to remain with a problem when leaving is easy.

Second Look

The ability to interrogate what sounds finished.

Next Question

The discipline of treating every answer as the beginning, not the end.

If one of these landed differently than the others, you already know where to start.

Cognitive Fitness

Not another AI skills quiz.
A diagnostic for your thinking.

Physical fitness metrics work because they're observable, quantifiable, and trackable over time. Cognitive fitness metrics need the same four properties.

7 metrics. 7 questions. A score you can benchmark quarterly. Find out whether AI is amplifying your thinking — or quietly replacing it.

Take the Cognitive Fitness Assessment

3 minutes · Free · Reassess quarterly

Latency-to-AIImpulse Control
Edit RatioCritical Override
First-Draft IndependenceGenerative Capacity
Error DetectionIntellectual Immune System
Question DepthEngagement Quality
Synthesis SpanIntegrative Thinking
Recall ConsolidationKnowledge Retention

Automation Exposure by Skill Type

Not all skills are equally at risk.

McKinsey mapped 800+ occupations and 2,100+ activities. The pattern is consistent: physical and cognitive execution is most exposed; social, creative, and judgment-based work is least.

High automation exposure
Data collection & processing81%
Predictable physical work78%
Routine cognitive tasks69%
Applied expertise (knowledge work)28%
Low automation exposure
Stakeholder interaction20%
Managing & developing people9%
Creative problem-solving6%

MGI, "Agents, Robots, and Us," 2026

How We Think

Most AI education teaches tools. We teach thinking. Because the real bottleneck was never access to technology. It was always imagination: what you can envision, and how precisely you can describe it. That is what we train.

The future belongs to better thinkers, not better tools.

The Three Horizons

The question isn't what AI can do. It's what you'll still be able to do: in five years, in fifteen, in fifty.

1–5 years

Now

The skills that separate someone who uses AI from someone who thinks with it. Query architecture. Judgment. Iterative depth. AI fluency is now the fastest-growing skill in global job postings — demand grew 7× in just two years (MGI, 2025–2026). These are the ones that compound.

Upskilling Programme →
5–15 years

Soon

The capacities AI structurally cannot touch. MGI's Skill Change Index identifies coaching, leadership, negotiation, and ethical reasoning as the lowest-exposure skills to automation. One-third of all non-physical work relies on social and emotional capacities that remain beyond AI's structural reach (MGI, 2026). Ambiguity tolerance. Signal reading. Meaning making.

Business Strategy →
15–50 years

The long game

What makes a human worth being. As agents handle cognitive tasks and robots handle physical ones, what remains distinctly human is not a capability — it is an experience. Embodied knowing. Moral imagination. Relational depth. Generative stillness. Not skills. Qualities of a life.

Education & Parenting →

We work across all three. Because training only for now is how you become irrelevant in ten years. Curious which of yours are strongest right now? That's where we start.

How It Works

We work on two things simultaneously, because one without the other doesn't hold.

The Partnership Model

People. Agents. Robots.

McKinsey maps 800+ occupations into a three-way partnership. The shift isn't replacement — it's redistribution of what each partner does best.

McKinsey maps every occupation into a primary partnership model — the mix of humans, AI agents, and physical robots that handles the majority of its tasks. The $2.9 trillion figure represents the combined economic value unlocked by 2030 when all three partners operate at full capacity.

People — 43%

Social interaction, ethical judgment, creative direction, leadership. The work that requires genuine human presence and accountability.

AI Agents — 44%

Knowledge synthesis, research, drafting, analysis, coordination. Software agents handling cognitive tasks at scale.

Robots — 13%

Physical logistics, manufacturing, warehouse operations. Robotics still lack dexterity for complex physical environments.

People 43%
AI Agents 44%
Robots 13%

43%

People

Social interaction, ethical judgment, creative direction, leadership. The work that requires genuine human presence and accountability.

44%

AI Agents

Knowledge synthesis, research, drafting, analysis, coordination. Software agents handling cognitive tasks at scale.

13%

Robots

Physical logistics, manufacturing, warehouse operations. Robotics still lack dexterity for complex physical environments.

Over 70% of skills employers seek today apply to both automatable and non-automatable work — they evolve, they don't disappear. MGI, "Agents, Robots, and Us," 2026

Who This Is For

We work with people who feel it first.

If you're a professional:

You're good at what you do. You're using AI. And something isn't adding up. The work is faster, but you're not sure you're actually getting smarter. You want to stay irreplaceable, not because of what you know today, but because of how you think tomorrow.

If you're a leader:

Your team has tools. You don't have a strategy. You can feel the difference between team members who are genuinely improving and ones who are just producing more. You need both clarity and infrastructure. You need to know which of those to build first.

If you're a parent:

You're not worried about your children's access to AI. You're worried about what happens to their capacity to think without it. You can't prepare them for jobs that don't exist. But you can make sure they're still capable of thinking when everyone else isn't.

If any of these is you:

The Netherlands, 2030

More jobs. Fewer prepared people.

The Netherlands isn't losing jobs — it's reshuffling them. A net gain of 250,000 roles by 2030. But only for those who make the shift intentionally.

Net +250,000 jobs
+400KCreated
−150KDisplaced

McKinsey Global Institute, "How AI Reshapes Work and Skills in Europe," 2026

+400KJobs created in growing segments
−150KJobs displaced in declining segments
15%of FTE hours automatable — below EU average
Labor market tightness tripling by 2030

The question isn't whether this shift happens. It's whether you're positioned for the 400,000 or the 150,000.

AI exposure by sector

Finance & Insurance68%
Information Technology61%
Public Administration54%
Education47%
Professional Services43%

% FTE hours automatable — EU comparison

Germany
18%
France
16%
Netherlands
15%
Sweden
14%
Poland
11%
Spain
10%

Social proof

What People Say

“Laura doesn't just teach you to use AI. She teaches you to think more clearly. That distinction took me weeks to truly feel. My work quality changed before my speed did.”
D
Daniela MuenteSenior Consultant, Netherlands
“After two hours of the upskilling session, I estimated saving one to three hours every week. That was day one. Six months later, the way my whole team approaches problems has changed.”
M
Marco VisserOperations Lead, AI Upskilling Program
“My leadership team was generating AI output constantly and going nowhere with it. Two sessions in, we had a strategy framework we had actually built for our specific context. That ownership changed everything.”
T
Thomas van der BergManaging Director, Professional Services, Netherlands
“Every AI consultant I had met sold certainty. Laura sold clarity and named exactly where the real uncertainty lives. That honesty is rare and worth more than any playbook.”
A
Arjun MehtaFounder & CEO, Technology Company, Amsterdam
“I came in thinking I needed better prompts. I left understanding why I was bad at asking questions in general. That is the uncomfortable, important truth this work surfaces.”
S
Sophie LaurentSenior Product Manager, Global Technology Company
“The Managing Disruptions newsletter is the only one I read the day it arrives. It is the one place that actually challenges how I think, not just what to do next.”
E
Emma de GrootMarketing Director, Utrecht
0%of organizations deploy AI — only 6% generate real value (McKinsey, 2026)
0%of European work hours have automation potential by 2030 (MGI, May 2026)
growth in AI fluency demand in just two years (MGI, 2025–2026)
0%of leaders feel unprepared to integrate AI into daily operations (McKinsey, 2026)

Managing Disruptions

A weekly newsletter about thinking clearly in noisy times. No tips. No hacks. Just better questions.

Join 500+ professionals, leaders, and parents who refuse to outsource their thinking.